And I will return to find out that this madman Bush says, these are the ones we would like to come at him from the point of view of the matter itself that he took (R.L. from the point of view of the ancestors and the history that the scriptures remembered) we have to reply and say that not all the histories that had the scriptures remember only some of them or some of those mentioned, And even though he would have brought to some of them many other sons than these, but he did not remember here only those whom the need brings to their memory, because these were the heads of the ancestral houses of their families, and the others only will be called by name when it happened to Joseph that he did not remember the scripture of all his sons, only Menashe and Ephraim because they were the head of all those born from their father Joseph, and when Jacob prophesied about them, our father, peace be upon him, and your homeland, those who are born after them to you, will be named after their brothers, they will be called in their inheritance, and here (RAL in the remembrance of Bnei Kohath) he did not remember, only those who were the heads of fathers of their families, and although he remembered at the end of them Nadav and Avihu and they did not There were heads of the family because they died in the mourning of Aharon their father and they had no sons, know that they must remember the matter that happened to them when they sacrificed foreign fire before God, that the previous Torah remembers and arranges a matter for a matter that needs to be remembered after a time and for this grandfather are most of the Torah books as I will write to you below and what will be revealed to you Another thing we said in the remembrance of those born to Seva.... The rest is that he remembered from the ancestors and the records sons and sons of sons, the sons of Aaron, and did not remember the sons of Moshe at all, even though the scripture explains in it that he begot Gershom and Eliezer years before, and they produced more histories than all of them, such as It is written in the Chronicles, the sons of Moshe Gershom and Eliezer, the sons of Gershom, who were the first, and Eliezer's sons were Rehabiah the head, and his father Eliezer had other sons, and the sons of Rehabiah were many above. Here you saw in your eyes that the scripture did not remember all those born to Lekath, and it is possible that he did not remember the rest of those born to them, only these, to her grandmother I said, And this error in itself is sufficient, except that it is possible that the sons of Moses who did not remember here are many, as is the testimony written there and the sons of Rehabiah were many above, there are several more of the true claims under the leadership of eternal nature, for those who do not tempt themselves to insist and hold on to a deception from it, and he is because there is no one who is obligated to be all Family histories are equal, DL that if the father and the sons did not have many sons, that the sons of the sons would not beget only in the number of the fathers' histories, because there are more sons than his fathers and the rest of his brothers, and it is possible that the sons of Lakheth gave birth to many children, and here Reuben son of Jacob, who was the eldest of the brothers, did not give birth to only four Sons, and Dan only fathered one, and he was the only one, and Benjamin, who was the youngest of the brothers, had ten sons before he went down to Egypt, and also because it is possible that they had many wives and gave birth to many sons, and this is not out of the proper scope. She explained that he had many wives, and behold, Gideon fathered seventy sons, and it is possible that he fathered a thousand sons to one man, and what is the matter if Solomon was born a thousand sons or even thousands after what the scripture attributed to him, that he had seven hundred concubines and three hundred concubines, and more in our time in the kings of the Ishmaelites And their ministers are many sons from many wives, you have shown that there is something wrong with them in this, and the inclination is from the nearest possible and even from the inclination from the proper, after all, it will not be called an inclination, only one whose heart is inclined to share a lie and finds an excuse on the part of the heretic in the words of our Lord Moses, peace be upon him, especially since it is not It is possible for no one to divide his name from the power of the one who avoids it, so we ask this madman, even if you put it from the power of the remote possibility, if it had already been, all the possible would have been pushed back many times, and this is from the power of the remote possibility, and if you deny from your mind what they said, even if there were many numbers testifying to it , then they have already died from the power of what is prevented, as we said, and moreover in the law of the Creator, he will be blessed if he